To the content
3 . 2022

Speech recognition technology: results of a survey of radiologists at the Moscow reference center for diagnostic radiology

Abstract

The development of medical digital technologies, such as computer vision and speech recognition, makes it possible to automate and simplify some of the radiologist’s routine tasks. Voice recognition systems reduce the time it takes to fill out medical records, improve workplace ergonomics, and make protocol texts more standardized. Despite this, voice recognition technology is only gaining popularity among specialists in the Russian medical community.

Material and methods. A sociological research method in the form of a questionnaire was used to study the opinion of radiologists about the use of a voice recognition system. The survey was conducted in March 2021 among the specialists of the Moscow Reference Center of Radiology. The questionnaire consisted of 28 questions.

Results. A total of 84 radiologists completed the survey. Slightly more than half of the radiologists (52.2%) prefer using voice recognition system when preparing study reports. Most respondents (62.8%) reported that the voice recognition system improves their efficiency, but 37.2% took a neutral stance or responded that the technology does not affect their efficiency. Most radiologists (72.1%) reported psychological discomfort when filling out protocols by voice in the presence of colleagues. The majority (81.4%) of respondents rated the quality of radiology vocabulary recognition as good and excellent: 58.1 and 23.3%, respectively.

Conclusion. The results of the survey showed the formation of positive attitudes among radiologists toward voice recognition technology. Among Russian-speaking radiologists there remains a wariness about the accuracy of Russian language recognition. As the technology develops and the quality of recognition improves, so does the physician’s attitude to voice completion of medical documents.

Keywords:speech recognition technology; voice input, diagnostic radiology; medical reports; survey

Funding. This publication was prepared by the team of authors as part of the research work (No. EGISU: АААА-А21-121012290080-8) in accordance with the Program of the Moscow City Health Department «Scientific support of the capital’s healthcare» for 2020–2022.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Contribution. Writing the text, collecting and processing materials, analyzing the data obtained – Kudryavtsev N.D.; analysis of the obtained data – Semenov D.S.; collection of materials – Kozhikhina D.D.; concept and design of the study – Vladzymyrskyy A.V.

For citation: Kudryavtsev N.D., Semenov D.S., Kozhikhina D.D., Vladzymyrskyy A.V. Speech recognition technology: results of a survey of radiologists at the Moscow reference center for diagnostic radiology. ORGZDRAV: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie. Vestnik VSHOUZ [HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT: News, Views, Education. Bulletin of VSHOUZ]. 2022; 8 (3): 95–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33029/2411-8621-2022-8-3-95-104 (in Russian)

References

1. Morozov S.P. Moscow experiment on the application of computer vision in radiation diagnostics: involvement of radiologists. Vrach i informatsionnye tekhnologii [Doctor and Information Technologies]. 2020; (4): 14–23. (in Russian)

2. Kudryavtsev N.D. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the implementation of speech recognition technology for the preparation of protocols for x-ray studies. Vrach i informatsionnye tekhnologii [Doctor and Information Technologies]. 2020; (S1): 40–7. (in Russian)

3. Houston J.D., Rupp F.W. Experience with implementation of a radiology speech recognition system. J Digit Imaging. 2000; 13 (3): 124–8.

4. Joseph J., et al. The impact of implementing speech recognition technology on the accuracy and efficiency (time to complete) clinical documentation by nurses: a systematic review. J Clin Nurs. 2020; 29 (13–14): 2125–37.

5. Blackley S.V., et al. Speech recognition for clinical documentation from 1990 to 2018: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019; 26 (4): 324–38.

6. Blackley S.V., et al. Physician use of speech recognition versus typing in clinical documentation: a controlled observational study. Int J Med Inform. 2020; 141: 104178.

7. Molchanova A.A., Petrushenko R.V. Speech technologies - the next level of service. In: Materials of the V International Scientific Conference «Technical Sciences in Russia and Abroad». Moscow, 2016: 6–8. (in Russian)

8. Irzaev M.G. Using voice input of information in medical institutions to fill in electronic cards and patient histories. In: Collection of Scientific Papers «New Technologies and Equipment in Medicine, Biology and Ecology». 2013; (3): 149–54. (in Russian)

9. In the departments of radiation diagnostics of Moscow polyclinics, voice input of conclusions was introduced [Electronic resource]. Vademecum. 2020. URL: https://vademec.ru/news/2020/06/10/v-otdeleniyakh-luchevoy-diagnostiki-moskovskikh-poliklinik-vnedrili-golosovoy-vvod-zaklyucheniy/ (in Russian)

10. From voice to text: how speech technologies improve medicine [Electronic resource]. Internet edition vc.ru. 2021. URL: https://vc.ru/speechpro/175409-iz-golosa-v-tekst-kak-rechevye-tehnologii-sovershenstvuyut-medicinu (in Russian)

11. Morozov S.P., et al. Reference center for radiation diagnostics: rationale and concept. Menedzhment v zdravookhranenii [Management in Healthcare]. 2019; (8): 25–34.

12. Hamilton D.F., et al. Assessing treatment outcomes using a single question. Bone Joint J. 2014; 96-B (5): 622–8.

13. Goss F.R., et al. A clinician survey of using speech recognition for clinical documentation in the electronic health record. Int J Med Inform. 2019; 130: 103938.

14. Saxena K., et al. Provider adoption of speech recognition and its impact on satisfaction, documentation quality, efficiency, and cost in an inpatient EHR. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2018; 2017: 186–95.

15. Baehre S., et al. The use of Net Promoter Score (NPS) to predict sales growth: insights from an empirical investigation. J Acad Mark Sci. 2022; 50 (1): 67–84.

16. Huisman M., et al. An international survey on AI in radiology in 1,041 radiologists and radiology residents part 1: fear of replacement, knowledge, and attitude. Eur Radiol. 2021; 31 (9): 7058–66.

17. Poder T.G., Fisette J.-F., Déry V. Speech recognition for medical dictation: overview in Quebec and systematic review. J Med Syst. 2018; 42 (5): 89.

18. Hammana I., et al. Speech recognition in the radiology department: a systematic review. Health Inf Manag J. 2015; 44 (2): 4–10.

19. Prevedello L.M., et al. Implementation of speech recognition in a community-based radiology practice: effect on report turnaround times. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014; 11 (4): 402–6.

20. Kagadis G.C., et al. Medical imaging displays and their use in image interpretation. Radiographics. 2013; 33 (1): 275–90.

21. Hugine A., Guerlain S., Hedge A. User evaluation of an innovative digital reading room. J Digit Imaging. 2012; 25 (3): 337–46.

CHIEF EDITOR
CHIEF EDITOR
Guzel E. Ulumbekova
MD, MBA from Harvard University (Boston, USA), Head of the Graduate School of Healthcare Organization and Management (VSHOUZ)
Вскрытие
Medicine today

Приветствуем вас в новом 2023 году, который мы встретили с надеждой и неизменно с планами на будущее! Традиционно в феврале ученики Николая Олеговича Миланова, сотрудники основанной им кафедры в Сеченовском Университете, планируют проведение уже девятой мемориальной...

Уважаемые коллеги! 10.02.2023 состоится Совместный научно-образовательный симпозиум Национальной Ассоциации по тромбозу и гемостазу и ФГБНУ "Научный центр неврологии" "Тромботические проблемы при цереброваскулярной патологии и коморбидных процессах". Начало регистрации в...

Приглашаем специалистов Сибирского федерального округа 9-10 февраля посетить Школу РОАГ! Успешно продолжается образовательная работа общероссийского проекта "Школы РОАГ". Очередная встреча пройдет 9-10 февраля в онлайн-формате и объединит врачей Иркутска, Кемерово, а также...


Journals of «GEOTAR-Media»